Thursday, May 12, 2016
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Jon
Garelick's review of Stanley Crouch's new book “Kansas City
Lightning:the rise and Times of Charlie Parker” in today's Globe is
on the money. He points out that Crouch goes for the home run but
occasionally misses. My vote is at that least he tried for the
home run. Most of it is successful. He has such passion for the
subject that it is easy to overlook where he misses. Miss: this is
not a book that you read to get actual information about Parker,
though. Garelick points out that Crouch is projecting himself into
scenes we only know only a few facts about. Crouch has no way of
knowing how Parker felt about those scenes, but he describes
his feelings any way. The plus side is Crouch immerses the reader in
the events; you get to experience them up close, feel them, and be
in them.
The low point is when he gets technical about the music. There are some errors.
I had low expectations for the book. I based this on previous Crouch record reviews and his soundbites in Ken Burns' “Jazz” documentary where he comes off as “Stanley Grouch” consistently. Also, check out his picture on the book sleeve- he looks like he is constantly peeved. Assuming he had some control of what his book looked like, I guess he is comfortable being portrayed that way.
If you go somewhere else to get the facts on Charlie Parker, this book is joyous to read because Crouch loves the music and does a damn good job of translating his love into prose.
---------------
The low point is when he gets technical about the music. There are some errors.
I had low expectations for the book. I based this on previous Crouch record reviews and his soundbites in Ken Burns' “Jazz” documentary where he comes off as “Stanley Grouch” consistently. Also, check out his picture on the book sleeve- he looks like he is constantly peeved. Assuming he had some control of what his book looked like, I guess he is comfortable being portrayed that way.
If you go somewhere else to get the facts on Charlie Parker, this book is joyous to read because Crouch loves the music and does a damn good job of translating his love into prose.
---------------
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Bach jams out
Bach
had digested the whole modern vocabulary of music theory. Or at least
usage. He knew the rules and yet he knew when and how to break them.
He was guided by rules, not contained by them. So that leaves a trap
for those who follow. Where to go? Bach had already taken it
technically very far. Where to go from there?
Jazz history course
I have ported my "Recent Jazz History" class to run on Prezi....... here it is
(It's big and opens slowly so give it a minute)
(It's big and opens slowly so give it a minute)
Friday, March 8, 2013
jazz for me
One good thing about retirement is that I can devote time to this crap. Yesterday I player Miles Davis' "Solar" for an hour and a half: Bass line, melody and soloing all locked up. I just revisited today and it was right there. Very satisfying and jazz is so deep you never run out of shit to do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)